I think there’s a distinction between what some ignorant people think of as “tattoos that signify gang membership” (i.e. literally any tattoo) and literal gang tattoos.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Third option: male fashion fucking sucks?
Fourth option: anatomically, skirts make more sense for penis-havers than pants (though there’s a reason why kilts traditionally include a pouch, which might be an issue when penis-havers want to dress in women’s skirts or dresses).
The northern “barbarians” wore pants even in roman times. The romans were agast (TBF, I wouldn’t want to wear pants in Italy’s climate, either). Since then there has been a bit of back-and-forth.
Yeah what the hell. That’s real power! Also, the way male biology works, he’ll take much longer to cum the second time. And if he doesn’t? Getting oral is nice, too. And if he doesn’t do oral? Then you dump that asshole.
Consider that CDs can be fairly ephemeral, and I think it’s a lot worse with home-burned CDs. When you grab something out of your home-burned CD collection in 10 years, there’s a pretty good chance that it won’t work or be super glitchy. Harddrives are way better for longterm storage, since you can easily copy the entire collection before the drive fails (and I think the classic magnetic spinny drives, as opposed to SSDs, also have at least better longevity than CD-RWs if you store them unpowered).
Who said it’s a quote?