• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I love the euphemism that she “slept with” 583 guys. I mean that’s a lotta naps in 6 hours! Takes me at least 20 minutes to drift off.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    OnlyFans star Annie Knight is sharing an update amid her recent hospitalization after sleeping with 583 men in six hours.

    It’s bizarre that US uses “sleeping with” to mean “had sex with”. Readers clearly understand, she uses the word “sex” in her quotes, but the magazine/site insists on using that bizarre euphemism.

    • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Jfc it’s just as bizarre as every other fucking cultures language on earth but I get it, it’s popular to shit on America while it’s fighting a civil war that was never declared. Easier than realizing this shit show is coming for you next.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I don’t think that that’s very uncommon. When one “goes to the bathroom”, it’s understood that this is a euphemism for urinating or defecating, not just hanging out there.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Agreed. It just seems like a weird editorial decision. Maybe it’s because I’m not a regular US reader, or I live in a different country, but it seems to slightly obfuscate what happened.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      One fewer word/syllable.

      I think they should pare it down further though, and just say ‘fucking’

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Wow. I hope she recovers fully and quickly.

    583 men in six hours.

    That’s about 37 seconds each.

  • huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “I don’t understand why people have such an issue with it. These guys are just out here living life. They’ve been given an opportunity, and they’re like, ‘F*** it. Like, let’s just do it.’ They’re just having some fun. I think the people that are hating [are] probably just jealous, and their lives are really boring …I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”

    • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      23 hours ago

      “…I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”

      I think that pretty much sums up a big part of America’s problem right there lol

  • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    This is the third name I’ve seen with a sex with hundreds of men title in the last month or so.

    In this a new trend??? In which case … I hate to be old school but wtf

    • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      i assure you that group sex is not a new trend. it predates agriculture, civilization, and humanity itself.

      those numbers would have been incredibly difficult to organize in the pre-internet era however.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It is, and there’s a handful of people trying to one-up each other.

      With great financial success, I might add.

    • vomitaur@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      threatening unwanted physical harm against friends/acquaintences for any reason is morally bankrupt.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It is, isn’t?

        Let me concern about the outcome of my actions.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I am. And the very sad conclusion I’m forced to draw is that most people don’t care enough about others to prevent unnecessary and easily preventable suffering.

            Like the case at hand.

            The woman ended in a hospital. Maybe - just maybe! - the men participating in the stunt should had stopped for a fraction of a second to think if they were enabling and causing unnecessary suffering.

            Maybe.

            I might be wrong.

            • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              People are into some weird shit, some of it is dangerous and/or disgusting. They were all consenting adults and it’s wrong to use violence to coerce them into behaving in ways that are less offensive to our sensibilities.

              • qyron@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Just because it’s legal, doesn’t make correct.

                The same way, many of the dangerous and/or disgusting things some individuals are into are considered a disturb.

                Following that, and remembering the spirit of my original reply, that by now has been removed, I would strongly - very strongly - disincentivize any friend or acquaintance if they told me they considered either taking part or were indifferent to the outcome of such a stunt. It would be one of those friendship ending situation.

                This is a calous indiference to human suffering and an easily preventable and avoidable one. And exploitation of it. Which is extremely sad. It is a telling sign of the times we live in.

                • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I’m not defending it on the basis of it being legal, I don’t think that’s relevant here. It’s enough that everyone involved was an adult and gave their willing consent.

                  People do things that cause them to suffer all the time, often in the pursuit of pleasure. We have neither the realistic means nor the moral authority to protect them from the consequences of their bad choices.

                  I’m not going to try and tell you that I wouldn’t judge everyone involved for choosing to live their lives this way, because I definitely would, but coercing them with violence into making different choices would likely do little to to prevent the original harm and only add more on top of it.

    • freeusething@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve never gotten up to that number in a night, but I’ve gotten up to 30 or so. Planned it out as a birthday treat for myself. Something I wanted to do, because it was fun.

      Some people really do like sex.

      • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You’re just advertising. No better than any other company lying in internet comments to get people to click. Fuck off.

        • freeusething@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          No? The quickest I block a guy is when they offer me money. I don’t have an OF and don’t want one. (If I took money, I’d feel pressured into doing things that I don’t like.)

          If I want clicks, it’s for my own… interests.