On Wikipedia sources are cited at the bottom of the page with a corresponding number above their usage in the article that links to the place at the bottom where it is sourced. If you go to this page, the claim that there are 17 fucks in the song also happens to be the 17th citation on this page thus having the number 17 at the end of the claim.
This is likey a coincidence but the humor this person sees is in the fact that these numbers are the same
Killing in the Name by Rage Against the Machine
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2009/dec/20/rage-against-machine-christmas-number-1
TIL. This is awesome.
The song contains the word “fuck” 17 times.[17]
I see what you did there Wikipedia
I don’t, could you explain it to us more dense folks?
On Wikipedia sources are cited at the bottom of the page with a corresponding number above their usage in the article that links to the place at the bottom where it is sourced. If you go to this page, the claim that there are 17 fucks in the song also happens to be the 17th citation on this page thus having the number 17 at the end of the claim.
This is likey a coincidence but the humor this person sees is in the fact that these numbers are the same
Makes sense and I feel dumb for not noticing considering how many wiki holes I’ve fell down.
Why feel dumb? You know more now than you did before, you should feel smarter!
Cause I should’ve understood the reference. But thank you for being supportive!