• Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    So why do people only get up in arms over literally? Because it’s the one they lived through? Here’s a bunch of words I’m sure you’re mostly, if not entirely fine with the dictionary listing their “new”, opposite meaning, and probably use them the new way too. That’s just off hand. There will be more if you google it.

    You can’t force the entire world to strictly follow a book on how words should be used. People are going to talk how they like. You can document how people are using words. That’s what makes sense to do.


    Awful

    Original: Full of awe or inspiring reverence.

    Now: Very bad or unpleasant.


    Terrific

    Original: Causing terror or fear.

    Now: Excellent or great.


    Egregious

    Original: Remarkably good or distinguished.

    Now: Shockingly bad.


    Disinterested

    Original: Unbiased, impartial.

    Now: Uninterested, not caring.


    Nonplussed

    Original: Bewildered, perplexed.

    Now: Unfazed or unimpressed.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      So why do people only get up in arms over literally? Because it’s the one they lived through?

      They didn’t live through it. It has been used an an exaggeration for more than a century.

      • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yes but not widely, and the point is, most people don’t even know awful had a different definition. Argue all you want but the fact there’s any controversy over literally shows we’re living through the main transition of it having one main definition to two.