• sparrownetwork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What comes from China, is readily available and not well regulated? Lasers. Maybe one 5mw pointer isn’t much, but a bunch of them?

    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Protestors used a ton of laser pointers in Argentina a few years back. It was effective but the crowds using them were often hit back violently by the police.

  • Ice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Seems like a shoddy ripoff of the “meme”/infographic from the Hong Kong protests:

    Poor sods. The CCP trampled all over them, and now they’re all stuck under Beijing’s boot.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is AI slop and missing critical details. It feels like a deliberate way to pass along bad info that sounds like good info. This feels like outsiders meddling, like a pallet of bricks near a march.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes, this is the equivalent of trying to solo a raid with low-level gear.

      Unless you go out of your way and purchase actual tactical gear such as plate carrier vests, ballistic eyewear, Kevlar helmets, and tactical boots that provide cover over your ankles to prevent rolling them as you run/walk over debris, you will be steamrolled by law enforcement all day everyday.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Definitely dont wear anything with print/designs on it. It is the No1 way cops use to find out peoples identity if they cant see their face or track them. Also, all the gear needs to be thrifted or they will request the sale history for each item from shops and stores to figure out who bought one of each.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The descriptions and pointers / connectors are all messed up.

    The left side should be:

    • Mask (missing all together)
    • Neck Buff (correct)
    • Arm Warmers (below)
    • Gloves (on the other side)
    • Shoes (missing all together)

    The right side should be:

    • Glasses (correct)
    • Shirt (on the other side)
    • Umbrella (below)
    • Knee pads (on the other side)
      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        In the era of AI, folks always seem to forget that people make mistakes. Artists fuck up anatomy, infographic designers make typos, none of that means AI was involved.

        The protester doesn’t match the description and could be AI, or it could be a non AI stock image that the infographic creator found. It’s hastily slapped together regardless, but that doesn’t mean it’s AI.

        People have a serious Dunning-Kruger problem with spotting AI; thinking any errors in an otherwise professional looking image are valid evidence. You really need to look for mistakes humans are less likely to make.

        • Miner_Fabs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I agree with your point in general - there’s no use in being skeptical if you call stuff fake at the first sign. Innocent until proven guilty or whatever.

          You’re right that the image could be clipart, and a human could have made those typos, but there are some non-human tells in here other than that.

          Zoomed in version of the post image, highlighting several errors

          The P in protection is a lowercase capital, and one of the r’s in irŕritation is accented. The latter could’ve been mistyped on a phone keyboard, but in that case it would’ve been autocorrected, and that still doesn’t explain the P.

          There’s also some weird GPT-like descriptions that are thrown in for no reason. Why does the bandana being “fashionable” matter? How are arm warmers “subtle”, exactly?

          As another commentor pointed out, a T-shirt with a graphic is more likely to make you recognisable, so that part’s just wrong. I also don’t get why “tactical/military bags” should be “avoided”? Seems like the kinda misinformation AI would spout.

          What I really don’t get here is why someone would use AI to generate the entire thing, rather than only using it for the graphic (still morally questionable but excusable) and adding the text in manually (something you can do in MS paint).

          • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The weird lowercase capital is pretty sus, but the writer being a non English speaker could throw things off. It’d explain the odd phrasing and disconnect they seem to have with the seriousness of the situation.

            My family members in LA rn have seen ICE everywhere, from restaurants to hotels. Spreading such questionable advice in a time like this is fucked up regardless of it being AI. People are getting shipped out of their homes, many to camps, so this is not the time or place for people to be fucking around.

        • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You really need to look for mistakes humans are less likely to make.

          Yeah, like the “descriptions and pointers / connectors are all messed up.” Or including nonsense like “tain”.

          I am all for benefit of the doubt here, but only when it is warranted. The probability of this being a single prompt generated image is very, very high. And no amount of “hastily slapped together” excuses it.

          • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Am I crazy for thinking these mistakes seem very human and not very AI?

            Like some other commenter said, “tain” isn’t nonsense. It’s a typo for rain, t being adjacent to r on the keyboard and all.

            The mixed up pointers is really just out of order text boxes. Illustration software manages the flow of text between text boxes, and something misconfigured explains the mixed up connectors. Conversely this doesn’t seem like an AI error given that the intelligence making the image knows what a shoe is.

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Thrifted motocycling gear is the way to go if you want decent protection for cheap and without standing out too much. Leather is a good idea in general. And don’t use a sling bag. Too easy to grab and swings around when you run. Use a daypack for hiking and keep the straps short for a tight fit. And preferably wear boots rather than sneakers.

    If you need something heavy duty you can make bulletproof (to a degree) carrier plates from fiberglass welding sheets and epoxy. There are guides on youtube where you can also see the protective capabilities in action.

    • LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      All the videos I’ve seen the homemade fiberglass armor only stops .22 LR and maybe .22 magnum which ain’t gonna do anything but still cool nonetheless

      • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Here you can see it stopping 10mm and 12ga buckshot. It’s not a perfect replacement for military grade body armor but it’s the next best thing for a fraction of the price.