Yeah, I have no problem with any people in general. But I’ve got lots and lots of problems with Jews, Muslims, Russians, Belgians, the Swiss, Kenyans, brunettes, Inuits or anyone else when they decide to invade countries for the purposes of removing their people and moving in their own.
In my final years on the right, I’ve read a Hungarian blog post titled “Unpopular opinion: the answer to the Jewish question is Israel”, and it not only begun with the worst “I’m not antisemitic, some great people were Jewish, but” (except multiple paragraphs), but also talked about how Jewish people are unfit to “live alongside with non-Jews”, and that the solution to all of it to let Israel have all of Palestine and maybe some other smaller Arabic countries as their population can just live in other countries like Saudi-Arabia (the same blog also regularly whined about the Treaty of Trianon, so…), and then the “peaceful deportations” can begin.
It makes sense that racists who think humanity should be divided along racial lines would be broadly in agreement with each other, even when they are on different sides of those lines. It’s up to the rest of us to see through the lie that those divisions are the actual sides, when of course there is also pro-ethnostate and anti-ethnostate.
Thats because for the most part counties that committed horrific acts (ex: Germany, UK, China, France, etc) are well established countries or (ex: US, Canada, Australia) have had colonial rule for so long they’ve become established. Meanwhile if you compare Israel to other settler colonial counties like Rhodesia you’ll find that they collapsed the second apartheid rule ended.
As a Jewish person I have personally experienced more antisemitism and general hate from zionists than any antizionist
ANTIZIONISM =/= ANTISEMITISM
Yeah, I have no problem with any people in general. But I’ve got lots and lots of problems with Jews, Muslims, Russians, Belgians, the Swiss, Kenyans, brunettes, Inuits or anyone else when they decide to invade countries for the purposes of removing their people and moving in their own.
In my final years on the right, I’ve read a Hungarian blog post titled “Unpopular opinion: the answer to the Jewish question is Israel”, and it not only begun with the worst “I’m not antisemitic, some great people were Jewish, but” (except multiple paragraphs), but also talked about how Jewish people are unfit to “live alongside with non-Jews”, and that the solution to all of it to let Israel have all of Palestine and maybe some other smaller Arabic countries as their population can just live in other countries like Saudi-Arabia (the same blog also regularly whined about the Treaty of Trianon, so…), and then the “peaceful deportations” can begin.
It makes sense that racists who think humanity should be divided along racial lines would be broadly in agreement with each other, even when they are on different sides of those lines. It’s up to the rest of us to see through the lie that those divisions are the actual sides, when of course there is also pro-ethnostate and anti-ethnostate.
Effectuvely translates to:
Never let a zionist lie to you that it was ever consensus among Jews to relocate to a new ghetto.
Removed by mod
Thats because for the most part counties that committed horrific acts (ex: Germany, UK, China, France, etc) are well established countries or (ex: US, Canada, Australia) have had colonial rule for so long they’ve become established. Meanwhile if you compare Israel to other settler colonial counties like Rhodesia you’ll find that they collapsed the second apartheid rule ended.
Removed by mod
That “believe” seems to imply that China doesn’t commit genocide.
Removed by mod
???