Do we actuall remember Ea-Nasir, or do we just recall a modern meme about one aspect of his life?
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Thanks for the comment, it rather made my day.
Actually, you have that backwards, you see, the act was known as ‘shagging’, from the old english ‘shagadelic’ meaning excellent or enjoyable, long before the carpet existed. The style of carpet was found to be ideal for ‘shagging’ on, especially in groups, as the long fibres reduced slipping. Thus it became known as ‘shag pile’ due to the piles of ‘shaggers’ often using them.
This post is brought to you by the letters B, S, and insufficient sleep.
notabot@lemm.eeto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•The New York Times Really Asked Ms. Rachel If She's Paid By HamasEnglish51·26 days agoFrom the rest of the article I very much got the ‘crazy people send crazy message’ message, but I can see how that might depend on the reader.
You say the letter is meaningless, but I think we have to be careful. Sesame Street teaches kindness, inclusivity and caring, and I think the republicans would be only too happy for an excuse to tear it down.
notabot@lemm.eeto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•The New York Times Really Asked Ms. Rachel If She's Paid By HamasEnglish321·26 days agoI’ve read the NYT article, and I can’t see anywhere where the author ‘sincerely considers the idea that Rachel Griffin-Accurso, the popular children’s entertainer known as Ms. Rachel, might be financially compensated by Hamas.’ Instead they report that ‘the advocacy group StopAntisemitism’ ‘sent a letter urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether Accurso is receiving funding to further Hamas’s agenda.’
The article as a whole seems pretty positive towards Miss Rachel, and uses her comments to point out how bad things are in Gaza, and insinuates that StopAntisemitism are the problematic ones.
Not at all, but I’d say we don’t really remember ancient kings either. We might remember the effect they had on the world, or some particularly unusual characteristic that was recorded for posterity, but I’d say that once the last person who knew them dies, we can no longer remember ‘them’, so much as witness a sort of ‘shell’ of ideas about them.
We don’t remember what they sounded like, or smelt like, how they smiled or what they said to their nearest and dearest. We don’t really know much about them as people compared to the king that became their shell. The things that made them unique people are gone when the last person who experienced them dies, so I’d say we really don’t remember them as people, even if we do remember the ‘king’ or ‘copper merchant’.