• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 22nd, 2024

help-circle


  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonedumbass rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yes, but read the last part of my comment. There are still some liberals today who would not be considered conservative. They still believe in liberal democracy, individual freedom and open to revolution if it comes to it, but they are skeptical of economic liberalism. So yes, context still matters, which transcends time and space.


  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonedumbass rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Liberalism is pro- status quo

    As people would say, context is king. So it depends. The OG liberals were anti-status quo and open to radical changes. But now since liberalism has become the status quo, liberals are now the conservatives and some prefer moderated approach, which unfortunately enables fascism. But even so, some liberals still believe in radical changes if push comes to shove.





  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonedumbass rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Huh? Maybe at this day and age, sure, but liberal means progressive at the time when its ideas were being formulated. They opposed feudalism and monarchies at the time, which are the conservatives at the time.

    What is considered conservative today is considered liberal in the past. And what is considered liberal today is considered unthinkable in the past. It just that the Overton window shifted.