• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: May 3rd, 2025

help-circle

  • First I couldn’t read the full article because I don’t subscribe to the NYT, but…

    I don’t think the response is providing cover. It encourages the question-asker to use this rental income for lobbying against ICE.

    It’s providing cover in exactly the same way that billionaires use philanthropy to launder their image: by asserting that giving a tiny portion of one’s ill-gotten gains to ‘good causes’ somehow ameliorates the ethical implications of acquiring it in the first place.

    It does not.



  • Well, I see the NYT has certainly evolved with the changing times. Where once it pretended to talk about issues faced by us all it has now apparently retreated to the much more financially-secure world of providing ethical cover for landlords who profit from human suffering. If this is a ‘war on immigration’ these guys are literally war profiteers. Definitely ‘speaking for the people’ there, NYT. No, in case you were wondering, the word ‘rich’ does not in fact belong inside those quotes.