I don’t know, man, Die Hard is pretty far out there.
The Rambo and Rocky sequels are what they are as well. They are almost naive about it in a way that supports ironic appreciation, though.
Dirty Harry tracks, but that’s back in the early 70s. I never went deep enough into the sequels to see if it got really bad down the line.
I’ve heard some stuff about Field of Dreams, but I don’t think I’ve watched that in one sitting.
I don’t know it’s often the action stuff. Your Commandos and Death Wishes and so on. Does stuff like Red Dawn and Invasion USA even count as “crypto”? Those are pretty overt.
If you let me break the time frame I will say that I think The Incredibles flies over people’s heads as being aggressively conservative. Forrest Gump used to, but I think people got wise to it over time. Another Zemeckis joint, too. Maybe it’s Roger Rabbit that was the accident.
The Incredibles flies over people’s heads as being aggressively conservative.
Superheroes are a metaphor for minorities. There’s the immigrant experience in constantly moving house, the queer experience in hiding who you are, the neurodivergent experience in being told not to stick out in school.
The villain is a capitalist billionaire who wants to appropriate a minority’s culture without understanding what it means. If you’re an indigenous minority you’ve been through that.
There’s a scene where the mum has a talk with her kids about treating authority figures they’ve been trained not to fear as threats to their lives. That talk is familiar to any black family in the USA.
There’s a struggle between parents and their children about how to navigate assimilating into the majority culture while retaining their own identity. Many immigrants go through what Dash and Violet did.
That’s not an invalid read. My problem with it is that the movie doesn’t show the supes as being inherently feared or hated. This isn’t the X-Men, which does work on that front.
Here the supes are suppressed by the government, not a societal issue. They are presented as being accepted in the past, in a world without intervention. Thriving, in fact. They are celebrities and have a whole James Bond-style support system. They didn’t come from a different place with a different culture like Superman or Wonder Woman. Superheroes-as-minorities is a very frequent trope, but The Incredibles isn’t rehashing any of those, they’re doing the Fantastic 4. Superheroes-as-family. Bit of a different tack.
And when they’re suppressed they aren’t suppresed into a marginal role in society. They are suppressed into suburban white middle class. Which, incidentally, is presented as less flashy than the life of the one explicitly black character, but that is probably a well-meaning accident.
I do think the concept of cultural appropriation is and has alway been iffy, but beyond that, while I think you can argue that read I don’t think it fits the movie particularly well.
And yes, in the moral space the movie is drawing it is explicitly including those characteristics as part of the exceptionality you are supposed to self-realize. As I told you on the other thread, I don’t think Bird has a Randian “you should be an asshole if you want to” approach to this. He sees it as moral and ethical and valuable for society when people can self express their exceptional, natural abilities, and I do believe there is an explicit attempt to include those things in the mix. It’s why the slightly token black guy is there in the first place.
I should say I also think it’s undermined because the one instance of someone even appearing to have a recognizable trait of those things in the main family, which would be Vi’s crippling social anxiety, is shown as getting better when she fully expresses her powers and self-realizes, which if a bit of an icky approach.
Here the supes are suppressed by the government, not a societal issue. They are presented as being accepted in the past, in a world without intervention
Not true. The government shut down the superhero program because of public pressure. The catalyst was the suicide jumper that Bob saved. But around that time there were a lot of incidents of property damage and lawsuits that made it too expensive for the government to have superheroes, because of what the people were doing.
I don’t know, man, Die Hard is pretty far out there.
The Rambo and Rocky sequels are what they are as well. They are almost naive about it in a way that supports ironic appreciation, though.
Dirty Harry tracks, but that’s back in the early 70s. I never went deep enough into the sequels to see if it got really bad down the line.
I’ve heard some stuff about Field of Dreams, but I don’t think I’ve watched that in one sitting.
I don’t know it’s often the action stuff. Your Commandos and Death Wishes and so on. Does stuff like Red Dawn and Invasion USA even count as “crypto”? Those are pretty overt.
If you let me break the time frame I will say that I think The Incredibles flies over people’s heads as being aggressively conservative. Forrest Gump used to, but I think people got wise to it over time. Another Zemeckis joint, too. Maybe it’s Roger Rabbit that was the accident.
Superheroes are a metaphor for minorities. There’s the immigrant experience in constantly moving house, the queer experience in hiding who you are, the neurodivergent experience in being told not to stick out in school.
The villain is a capitalist billionaire who wants to appropriate a minority’s culture without understanding what it means. If you’re an indigenous minority you’ve been through that.
There’s a scene where the mum has a talk with her kids about treating authority figures they’ve been trained not to fear as threats to their lives. That talk is familiar to any black family in the USA.
There’s a struggle between parents and their children about how to navigate assimilating into the majority culture while retaining their own identity. Many immigrants go through what Dash and Violet did.
That’s not an invalid read. My problem with it is that the movie doesn’t show the supes as being inherently feared or hated. This isn’t the X-Men, which does work on that front.
Here the supes are suppressed by the government, not a societal issue. They are presented as being accepted in the past, in a world without intervention. Thriving, in fact. They are celebrities and have a whole James Bond-style support system. They didn’t come from a different place with a different culture like Superman or Wonder Woman. Superheroes-as-minorities is a very frequent trope, but The Incredibles isn’t rehashing any of those, they’re doing the Fantastic 4. Superheroes-as-family. Bit of a different tack.
And when they’re suppressed they aren’t suppresed into a marginal role in society. They are suppressed into suburban white middle class. Which, incidentally, is presented as less flashy than the life of the one explicitly black character, but that is probably a well-meaning accident.
I do think the concept of cultural appropriation is and has alway been iffy, but beyond that, while I think you can argue that read I don’t think it fits the movie particularly well.
And yes, in the moral space the movie is drawing it is explicitly including those characteristics as part of the exceptionality you are supposed to self-realize. As I told you on the other thread, I don’t think Bird has a Randian “you should be an asshole if you want to” approach to this. He sees it as moral and ethical and valuable for society when people can self express their exceptional, natural abilities, and I do believe there is an explicit attempt to include those things in the mix. It’s why the slightly token black guy is there in the first place.
I should say I also think it’s undermined because the one instance of someone even appearing to have a recognizable trait of those things in the main family, which would be Vi’s crippling social anxiety, is shown as getting better when she fully expresses her powers and self-realizes, which if a bit of an icky approach.
Not true. The government shut down the superhero program because of public pressure. The catalyst was the suicide jumper that Bob saved. But around that time there were a lot of incidents of property damage and lawsuits that made it too expensive for the government to have superheroes, because of what the people were doing.