• zagaberoo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    You assume I mean spirits that physically exist separately from people. I do not. You have missed my point entirely.

    Even the simple question of what the experience of color is like is totally beyond empiricism.

    Not everything has a scientific answer, and that’s ok.

    • rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Oh, ok. I still think we might be able to measure such things in the future, but that’s a much more defensible position. I don’t see how that pertains to spiritualism tho, maybe there’s a term that fits that better. Belief in qualia?

      • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m not really talking about belief so much as the fact that people need nourishment in unmeasurable ways: love, wonder, etc. I don’t think it makes sense to exclude that from spirituality. I have found that ‘spirituality = supernatural’ is unnecessarily reductive.

        But, at the end of the day it’s just individual perspective as to what constitutes the spiritual.