• illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ok, so his family believed he would forgive, wrote statement for him and made AI make it look like the victim said it. And this is somehow relevant to the court? It’s all nice the family thinks this but what has it got with justice?

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      But, the Judge, Todd Lang, loved that AI. It was well received. Go figure.

      We’re living in a parallel universe now.

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Why would a judge allow this? It’s like showing the jury a made-for-TV movie based on the trial they’re hearing.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not only did he allow it,

      While the state asked for a nine-and-a-half year sentence, the judge handed Horcasitas a 10-and-a-half year sentence after being so moved by the video, Pelkey’s family said, noting the judge even referred to the video in his statement.

      It has about as much evidentiary value as a ouija board, but since the victim was a veteran and involved with a church and the judge likes those things we can ignore pesky little things like standards of proof and prejudice